The research design falls largely into two main clusters: qualitative, or quantitative, or a combination of both, as follows (McLeod, 2008; Veal, 2005):
- Qualitative strategies, which look for behaviour (eg, inductive, word, image, sound or video coding, interview, focus group, ethnography, action research)
- Quantitative strategies, which look for numerical statistical patterns (eg, deductive, survey, experimental approaches, mathematical modelling, SPSS)
- Mixed methods strategies, using some of each (e.g., cross-sectional, cross-sequential or longitudinal studies)
Where we have a small data set, qualitative research can be useful. It allows us to explore in depth how people think or feel - using case studies, interviews, focus groups and surveys yielding textual data - and be able to draw some conclusions. However, generalisability is a problem with qualitative studies, as is researcher bias. It can also take quite a long time to gather our data when undertaking qualitative study, as we are dealing with human subjects, and need to take our time to collect good quality data.
Normally, an inductive inquiry strategy is used with a qualitative research design (or qualitative data). It would also be normal to use a subjective research philosophy.
Quantitative data is usually a numeric measure that yields something which can be counted, ranked, categorised, graphed, or statistically analysed using a range of techniques and processes. Sources come from experiments, lab tests, surveys (yielding numerical data) or structured observations. Normally, an deductive inquiry strategy is used with a quantitative research design (or with quantitative data), and an objective research philosophy.
Hopefully that makes the difference between qualitative and quantitative research designs clear!
Sam
References:
- Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design (Third Edition). USA: Sage
- McLeod, S. A. (2008). Qualitative vs. Quantitative. Retrieved 7 July 2017 from https://www.simplypsychology.org/qualitative-quantitative.html
- Veal, A. J. (2005). Business Research Methods (Second Edition). Australia: Pearson Education
Wow, great post.
ReplyDeleteThanks Mitchel, much appreciated: and I am so sorry I didn't reply to your post earlier!
DeleteHi I would like to know if I can use this diagram in a book chapter I am writing? Can you tell me how to get permission to copyright.
ReplyDeleteThanks Jessica: this is a construction that I put together myself based on John Creswell's explanation of research method (with elements of Anthony Veal). With regard to copyright, you would need to credit me. I will email you.
DeleteI can be reached by email at jessicarusso123@yahoo.com
ReplyDeleteThanks Jessica - will email you.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi, what do you think is the best research design for qualitative research if the instruments that was used are questionnaire and checklist with open ended question?
ReplyDeleteGood question: surveys are usually considered a quantitative, or a mixed methods, tool. If you took a pragmatic approach, you could use an inductive survey if you used a lot of text answers, or impressions through imgages, rankings, emotional reactions etc, then analysed using qualitative tools.
DeleteMarvelous information. Keep it up.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your feedback, Unknown: glad you found it useful!
Delete