Pages

Showing posts with label 2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2012. Show all posts

Tuesday, 25 December 2012

Look Ma, No Mouse!

PC Magazine have a great tip for those of us using MS Office 2010.

You can avoid having to mouse-click your way through Office's Ribbon with a single tap of the Alt key. Tap it, and little boxed letters will appear on all the ribbon tabs, with numbers appearing in the Quick Access area. Then all you have to do is key the letters for the item you want.

For example, if you are in Outlook, in an email folder view, with an email selected. If you key Alt, then H, this will take you to the Home tab, where you can see a selection of command letters. Then key "RP" and a reply to selected email will pop up, ready for you to type into. Drop down and expansion lists also have lettered items you can select. Once in menus or lists, you can use also arrow keys to select items.

To get back to normal view, just click Alt again. So easy.

Go to http://www.pcmag.com/slideshow_viewer/0,3253,l=265741&a=265729&po=3,00.asp to view PC Mag's original article.
read more "Look Ma, No Mouse!"

Friday, 7 December 2012

Newsletter Issue 227, December 2012



Sam Young Newsletter

Issue 227, December 2012
Hi guys,
If you had to make a bet on what is likely to happen with education by 2020, what would you pick as being some big changes? Read The Future of Online Learning below.
Wow, now this is a marriage of a very different kind: The Warehouse & Noel Leemings
Don't forget, if you want to be taken off my mailing list, click here to send me a reply e-mail and I will remove your name.
View  View Sam Young's profile on LinkedIn
The Future of Online Learning?

We all like to think that our workplaces will ensure we get the training we need to ensure we get better at what we do. However, an online Colmar Brunton-David Forman Business Training Survey (Scoop, 13 August 2012; Editor, August 2012) undertaken in May 2012 found that only just over a quarter of Kiwis think they get training linked to career development and goals, and only half think training improves their role effectiveness.
David Forman MD Olivia Blaylock says “Continuous learning and skill development is a priority for switched on employees, and the survey revealed a strong interest from employees in developing leadership, management and personal effectiveness skills. [...] But it is sobering that half of those surveyed felt their training wasn’t going to help them [to better] do their job” (Scoop, 13 August 2012).

Ms Blaylock went on to say that research shows that staff retain training much more by when it relates to their career development, “So it is really concerning that so many thought their training wasn’t relevant to their career goals” (Scoop, 13 August 2012).

Training investment is known as a key to ensuring staff remain loyal and committed, with a third of people surveyed wanting more training. “That is a significant group. The survey has shown that the key is for organisations to get the balance of quality and quantity right, and spend their training dollar on the most effective training available” (Scoop, 13 August 2012).

Which leads me to MOOCs, or massively open online courses. The MOOCs phenomenon is growing, with Georgetown Uni the latest to join MIT, Stanford, Harvard, Princeton, Berkeley, Wellesley, Texas U & a few European Unis in putting all their content online. Anyone can register and undertake courses at these institutions, working entirely online, exploring the materials and interacting on the blogs. However, you can only receive a qualification if you pay the course fee. In addition, start-ups like UniversityNow and Udacity offer online-only courses which are either free or low cost.

Most Unis appear to be using Harvard's EdX platform (check out http://www.guardian.co.uk/higher-education-network/blog/2012/aug/08/mooc-coursera-higher-education-investment for more info). With every university setting up their own online courses, there is a huge pile of resources out there: some of which are better than others. 

Schwartz (2012) cited a Pew survey in which two thirds of respondents believe there will be substantial change in education by 2020. Pew suggests higher education in 2020 will be video-conferenced to you at home, supported by expert online resources, with individualised just-in-time learning activities. In the future, if you get together as a class in real-time, those times will be for discussions, not lectures; lectures you will do at home on your own.

Schwartz (2012) also cites a respondent who thinks that 'location-based' higher education is nearing the end of its life, quoting "I believe we will see somewhat of a return to a Socratic model of single sage to self-selecting student group, but instead of the Acropolis, the site will be the Internet, and the students will be from everywhere”.

It is hard to get into a field without a degree, and that is unlikely to change in the near future, but it is likely that there will be more paths to acheive a degree than there are today. Future learning assessments will allow for far more flexibility and individually-oriented outcomes relating to subject mastery. Graduation requirements will be also be tailored to customised outcomes (Schwartz, 2012), which may, in the short term, dumb down some degrees, but this will correct over time.

Long term, we are likely to see massive international harmonisation of degrees and  and component courses, a huge correction and rationalisation in the global education sector. It will be messy, and it will take a long time to work through. We will have lots of redundant teachers at all levels.

On the upside, having a Harvard degree will suddenly become achievable for anyone able to pay for the qualification. But then, what is it that people pay for in a degree? If it is, as I suspect, their networks, then the online degree will need to ensure that it still delivers that.

That will be a challenge of a different sort!

 

References:


 



The Warehouse & Noel Leemings



Kiwis know the Warehouse as the place where "everyone gets a bargain", retailing consumer goods in New Zealand since 1982. A pioneer of parallel importing, discounting and stripping out the fat, the 91 'Red Sheds' take a very low margin, high turnover approach to selling, with bare-bones spaces and red t-shirted staff.

The Noel Leemings Group consists of 92 Noel Leeming and Bond & Bond appliance, electronics and technology retailers nation-wide. Noel Leemings is in the mid-price range, with Bond & Bond a little below that. There are other large players who are more electronics and technology oriented (such as the more homeware-focused  Briscoes and Farmers, and the more tech-focused JB HiFi and Dick Smith Electronics), but these two Noel Leemings Group brands are probably the largest appliance retailers in the New Zealand market.

The Warehouse has been trying to break into appliance retail for some time, but has been unable to gain access to the brands it wants to stock. Apparently retailers in competition with the Warehouse (like those mentioned above), have been pressuring their manufacturers not to supply the Red Sheds; but if the Warehouse has a modus operandi, it is that of bypassing traditional approaches. Last week, The Warehouse's $65m takeover of Noel Leeming Group was announced (Williams & Bridgeman, 11 December 2012; Adams, 11 December 2012).

There is quite a bit of speculation as to what this will mean for retail electronics, appliances and technology. Some pundits figure this will help 'the Red Shed' access those electronics brands it has been unable to stock previously (Adams, 11 December 2012), while others think this purchase downgrades the value of the Warehouse's shares (Williams & Bridgeman, 11 December 2012).

Chris Adams of the New Zealand Herald (11 December 2012) says:

Tim Morris, an analyst at market research firm Coriolis, said the purchase was one of the best strategic moves The Warehouse could have made. "For 20 years The Warehouse has been struggling to get big brands, particularly in electronics and whiteware," Morris said. "Now, in one swoop, they're going to get access to them." Powell would not rule out ditching the Bond & Bond retail brand, which offers a very similar range of products to Noel Leeming, and rebranding those stores as Noel Leeming. "We've got no firm, preconceived view [on a rebranding]," he said. "What I want from each of our retail brands is clear brand positioning and personality that the customer can understand. So going into the new year we'll look at how that all fits together".

It will be interesting to see what the new year brings, and what this will do for retail in New Zealand.



References:




Resizing Headings to Fit



TechRepublic have a tip on how to resize a heading to fit in the line space you have for it, and not wrap onto two lines; very useful for laying out newsletter headlines or report titles.

Word has two spacing options which work well for this, Spacing and Scale.

  • Spacing:

  1. Highlight your title
  2. Right-click
  3. Choose Font from the pop-up menu
  4. Advanced tab | Spacing setting, set to Condensed (or Expanded if you want to make your title longer)
  5. Click OK

  • Scale:

  1. Highlight your title
  2. Right-click
  3. Choose Font from the pop-up menu
  4. Advanced tab | Scale setting, choose 90% (or less & juggle till it fits)
  5. Click OK

Experiment to get the results that suit you best.



Reference: TechRepublic (13 November 2012). Create space with two helpful spacing options in Word. Retrieved 13 November 2012 from http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/window-on-windows/create-space-with-two-helpful-spacing-options-in-word/6886?tag=nl.e064&s_cid=e064



TLAs for SMEs



Here are this newsletter's TLAs (Three Letter Acronyms) for you:

  • PST, Personal STore file for Outlook. This is a fairly complex database that stores your mail, calendar, personal contacts and so on, when you use Microsoft Office's Outlook application. 


Please feel free to email me with any TLAs that you want to get the bottom (meaning!) of.



Tips, Short+Hot Keys

Over the next few newsletters, we are going to look at all you can do with panes. This time we look at Windows and Windows Media Player:

  • Windows "Move between active panes and the toolbar" F6
  • Windows "Move between active panes, options or the toolbar" Tab
  • Windows Media Player "Refresh the information in the panes in the Copy to CD or Device feature" F5



Hot Linx

IRD with StatisticsNZ have compiled and published industry benchmarks - medians and ranges - for 2009-10 and 2010-11. They are available at http://www.ird.govt.nz/industry-benchmarks/bm-find-your-benchmark/benchmarks-find-your-benchmark.html

There's an excellent article on what constitutes bullying, and the behaviours a bully may show from Denise Hartley-Wilkins at http://www.shinepeople.co.nz/blog/workplace-bullying/

Wow; imagine having uploaded 11 songs on a bittorrent site, then being prosecuted, without knowing that you were being charged, and only finding out when you received a fine of $4675... in New Zealand! Read on at http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2012/12/rianz_sought_4675_for_11_songs.html

So why would you want to be a director in New Zealand? Check out what Anne Callinan from Simpson Grierson has to say at http://www.simpsongrierson.com/who-wants-to-be-a-company-director-in-new-zealand/?goback=.gde_164708_member_194262906



                                Catch you again soon!! E-mail your suggestions to me here
read more "Newsletter Issue 227, December 2012"

Tuesday, 4 December 2012

Dub Dub Dub

Did you know that "WWW" - or the world wide web - has quite a controversy about saying its short form aloud?

If you are a Kiwi, it's easy. Here we pronounce it "dub, dub, dub"; but only in NZ.

If pronounced in full elsewhere on the planet, in English, at nine syllables, this is the longest TLA to pronounce. In fact, it longer than the words it replaces (three syllables). In written English it is an abbreviation. Author Douglas Adams - of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy fame - remarked "The World Wide Web is the only thing I know of whose shortened form takes three times longer to say than what it's short for".

Reference: Academic Room (2013). Internet, World Wide Web. Retrieved 20 March 2013 from http://www.academicroom.com/topics/what-is-internet
read more "Dub Dub Dub"

Thursday, 15 November 2012

Save Trees with GreenPrint

There's a nifty little tool called GreenPrint. You can use it as your printer handling tool, and it will give you a page by page thumbnail preview which allows you to decide which pages to print, which images not to print, determine if you want your pages in black-and-white or colour, set for duplex printing (double-sided), or save the print job as a pdf.

Not only do you get more print options, usually far more easily than you do with standard printer drivers, but you get to save ink, paper, and make a tiny contribution to saving the planet. For home use it costs a mere USD$19.

Check it out at http://www.printgreener.com/1/greenprint-world
read more "Save Trees with GreenPrint"

Friday, 2 November 2012

Newsletter Issue 226, November 2012



Sam Young Newsletter

Issue 226, November 2012
Hi guys,
If someone in your organisation has levelled a charge of bullying, don't ignore it! Check out Don't Ignore Bullying! below.
How often do we forget to ask ourselves how others feel? If you feel disconnected, try saying I Feel That You Feel...
Don't forget, if you want to be taken off my mailing list, click here to send me a reply e-mail and I will remove your name.
View  View Sam Young's profile on LinkedIn
Don't Ignore Bullying!



When bullying is reported organisations need to take it seriously and do something about it. Why? Employers have a duty of care toward their employees, and owe them a safe workplace.

If you read Newsletter 218, you would remember that The Employment Relations Authority (ERA) says bullying is "something that someone repeatedly does or says to gain power and dominance over another, including any action or implied action, such as threats, intended to cause fear and distress" (The Independent, 2006, as cited by Allwright, 2011).

Indicators of bullying include absenteeism, stress leave, increased staff turnover (or just higher than industry norms), increased personal grievances taken, increasing temporary staff costs, productivity drops, increased break times, increase in mistakes, increase in accident rate, critical deadlines being missed, and loss of institutional knowledge (Allwright, 2011; Lee, 2012; O'Driscoll et al, 2011). If some of these HR markers are changing, or particularly, if they are changing in one department, start looking for bullying. See smoke - think fire; but investigate respectfully.

The trick is to not be accusatory, but to get people talking about the issues, and bring things into the open. Everyone needs to feel safe enough to have a voice, and feel safe enough to listen to things that will be painful, challenging and will change them.

HR Daily in Australia posted an article recently on bullying at http://community.hrdaily.com.au/profiles/blogs/workplace-bullying-one-strike-and-you-re-out. The excellent feedback posted by Bernard Althofer on this article suggests that bullying happens where:

  • Poor people management, practices and skills exist
  • There is inappropriate management style or lack of supervision
  • Overwork happens
  • Role ambiguity occurs
  • Poor consultation processes occur
  • There are inconsistent work flows and reporting procedures
  • The level and nature of training is inadequate
  • There are unreasonable performance expectations

As you will no doubt remember from Newsletter 218, New Zealand still retains a largely authoritarian management approach; an entirely suitable culture medium to grow bullying within. In order for us to reduce bullying in New Zealand, we need to deal with the first point on Bernard Althofer's list. Correction there will provide a cascade that will eliminate many of the other issues.

Late last year, Michael O'Driscoll, Helena Cooper-Thomas, Tim Bentley, Bevan Catley, Dianne Gardner and Linda Trenberth released their research on bullying in the New Zealand workplace, entitled "Workplace bullying in New Zealand: A survey of employee perceptions and attitudes". They report nearly 20% of the 1700 kiwis surveyed were bullied at work (at the top end of the 5 to 20% world-wide range); but also that employees thought the following effective tactics for dealing with bullying:

  • Encouraging open communication
  • Encouraging appropriate interactions
  • Developing an anti-bullying policy
  • Developing a complaints procedure
  • Resolving conflicts quickly and fairly

However, having anti-bullying policy is not about catching bullies; it’s about fostering a employee climate of dignity and respect throughout the organisation. It should also foster keeping an eye on your HR markers so you can spot bullying behaviours early and provide mechanisms for correcting the perpetrators before they overly affect the staff around them.

So, the take-away is: check you are treating others with dignity and respect, ensure you are listening, and seek fair outcomes. Then mentor others so they can ensure that they do too.



References:


Allwright, Michelle (2011). Workplace Bullying: Structures and Human Resource Management Issues. NZ: NZABE Conference Proceedings.

Lee, Laura (November 2012). Workplace bullying - one strike and you're out? Australia: HR Daily. Retrieved 21 November 2012 from http://community.hrdaily.com.au/profiles/blogs/workplace-bullying-one-strike-and-you-re-out

O'Driscoll, Michael P.; Cooper-Thomas, Helena D.; Bentley, Tim; Catley, Bevan E.; Gardner, Dianne H, & Trenberth, Linda (2011). Workplace bullying in New Zealand: A survey of employee perceptions and attitudes. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, December 2011, Volume 49, Issue 4 (pp. 390-408). You can access O'Driscoll et al's article from Wiley Online's database if you have an account, or from EEO Trust if you are a member (go to http://opac.eeo.katipo.co.nz/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?bib=7007 to order).



I Feel That You Feel...



How powerful is it, to connect with others, and make them feel that you get what they are feeling?

It's huge, that connection, isn't it. So why is it that so often we don't stop to think what others are thinking and feeling, and put ourselves in their shoes for a minute?

With our families, our colleagues and our friends, we can so easily become complacent, and think we know the other person, and what they are thinking and feeling. We can forget to be empathetic, and forget to try to feel what they are feeling.

However, I recently read an excellent article by Mark Goulston (2012) on the AMA website, entitled "Make the Other Person Feel 'Felt' ", which reminded me that this is something that we can all let slip. What is even better is that Mark had an excellent checklist, which I have quoted here, that we can use to work through really listening to what the other person is saying:

  1. Attach an emotion to what you think the other person is feeling, such as frustrated, angry, or afraid.
  2. Say, “I’m trying to get a sense of what you’re feeling and I think it’s ————— ” and fill in an emotion. “Is that correct? If it’s not, then what are you feeling?” Wait for the person to agree or correct you.
  3. Then say, “How frustrated (angry, upset, etc.) are you?” Give the person time to respond. Be prepared, at least initially, for a torrent of emotions, especially if the person you’re talking with is holding years of pent-up frustration, anger, or fear inside. This is not the time to fight back, or air your own grievances.
  4. Next, say, “And the reason you’re so frustrated (angry, upset, etc.) is because...?” Again, let the person vent.
  5. Then say, “Tell me—what needs to happen for that feeling to feel better?”
  6. Next, say, “What part can I play in making that happen? What part can you play in making that happen?”

Mark has outlined a simple, but very powerful process.

However, being honest, we all know in practice that this is a very hard thing to do in the heat of the moment. So our best approach is to try to build this as a habit, and clock up our ten thousand hours (Gladwell, ) to gain expertise.

Remember: practice + practice + practice = habit



References:

  • Gladwell, Malcolm (2008). Outliers: The story of success. USA: Little, Brown and Company
  • Goulston, Mark (2012). Make the Other Person Feel “Felt”. Posting Date: November 06, 2012. USA: American Management Association. Retrieved 17 November 2012 from http://www.amanet.org/training/articles/Make-the-Other-Person-Feel-Felt.aspx?pcode=XA9T&CMP=NLC-LeadersEdge&wm_tag=email&spMailingID=4545895&spUserID=MTc3NjkwMTYwNDgS1&spJobID=133129371&spReportId=MTMzMTI5MzcxS0

Colour-code your Outlook Appointments



TechRepublic published a great tip on colour-coding in Outlook earlier this month.

Depending on your learning style, you may find using colour helps shortcut your decision-making, recognition and memory. If so, try colour coding your appointments, then all you will need is a quick glance to understand what you have on today.

While you can manually colour code appointments when you create them in Outlook 2003 (Right click on the appointment in calendar view, select Label and chose your colour), Outlook 2007 onwards lets you use a conditional format to automatically colour certain categories of appointments in a particular colour.

To do this, you need to:

  • Choose a keyword (a 'condition'). TechRepublic used 'CAMG'
  • In the Calendar window, click the View tab | Current View group | View Settings button | in 2010 click Conditional Formatting (in 2007, choose Automatic Formatting from the Edit menu)
  • Click Add to create a new rule
  • Enter a name for the rule (TechRepublic used "Set Color Personal")
  • Choose a colour (TechRepublic choose blue)
  • Click Condition (at the bottom-left of the dialogue box)
  • On the Appointments and Meetings tab, in the "Search For The Words" field, enter, eg 'CAMG'. Leave the default, "In Subject Field Only" for now.
  • Click OK three times to return to the Calendar window.
  • Now set your appointments and test them to ensure they work!

Later, when you apply this technique to other appointments, click the Advanced tab on the Appointments and Meetings tab and try a few things. You can do quite a lot with this, setting multiple and quite complex conditions.

Reference: TechRepublic (November 2012). Track your time better by automatically color coding your Outlook appointments. USA: Author. Retrieved 7 November 2012 from http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/window-on-windows/track-your-time-better-by-automatically-color-coding-your-outlook-appointments/6865?tag=nl.e064&s_cid=e064



TLAs for SMEs



Here are this newsletter's TLAs (Three Letter Acronyms) for you:

  • BYOD, Bring Your Own Device. This term is usually used around setting an organisational policy (ie, a BYOD policy) for the level of support that the IT department will supply employees for employee-owned PCs, smartphones and tablets.

Please feel free to email me with any TLAs that you want to get the bottom (meaning!) of.



Tips, Short+Hot Keys

Over the next few newsletters, we are going to look at all you can do with panes. This time we look at Publisher:

  • Publisher "Bring to front or move between the Navigation pane and the Help pane" F6
  • Publisher "Hide or show the Navigation pane in Help" Alt & O, Then T
  • Publisher "Move between the wizard pane and the publication" Ctrl & F9
  • Publisher "Move between the wizard pane and the publication" Ctrl & F9
  • Publisher "Move down within a page or scroll down in the Help pane" Page Down
  • Publisher "Move up within a page or Scroll up in the Help pane" Page Up
  • Publisher "Show the Office Assistant or If the Office Assistant is turned off, show the Help pane" F1



Hot Linx

Leadership Management Australia's latest survey is out, summarising Australian and Kiwi leader, manager and employee views on building a sustainable workforce. Get your copy at http://www.leadershipmanagement.com.au/wp-content/uploads/LMA-LEAD-October-2012-Summary.pdf

Read about a clever, clever use of science to identify where milk protein originates - and, therefore, whether its source is true to label - at http://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/234647/milk-identification-process-boon-nz


An interesting couple of articles about open access to research, instead if us having to pay to get articles. Read what the Guardian has to say at http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/jun/19/open-access-academic-publishing-finch-report and http://www.guardian.co.uk/higher-education-network/blog/2012/nov/08/open-access-academic-publishing-models?CMP=



                                Catch you again soon!! E-mail your suggestions to me here
read more "Newsletter Issue 226, November 2012"

Thursday, 1 November 2012

Newsletter Issue 225, November 2012



Sam Young Newsletter


Issue 225, November 2012

Hi guys,

This time we look at social media and how it may affect your career. Check out What Goes Online Stays Online below.

I consider That Gender Divide again following a LinkedIn repost of Richard Branson's. 


Don't forget, if you want to be taken off my mailing list, click here to send me a reply e-mail and I will remove your name.



What Goes Online Stays Online



Social media is a huge growth area, with every business owner wanting to know how they can generate value for their business by using it.

However, it also has huge potential for us: not merely from the opportunities to search and apply for jobs without having to step outside our own front door, but also by developing a professional online presence that helps to sell our skills in advance of an interview.

Employers will, at the minimum, google us, and at the maximum, run a full paid search of all networking sites before we even get on a shortlist. Howard Gauthier (24 September 2012) cites some statistics: 91% of employers use social media sites to screen candidates, with 76% searching Facebook, 53% Twitter and 48% LinkedIn.

Do some reading. HBR online has some good information on how to build a personal brand; but the key is consistency, and sending one message.

There are a number of channels that can be used to develop online profiles for the working world, and I will briefly explain the most popular, and how they are used:

  • LinkedIn (www.linkedin.com): a professional profile outlining previous paid and unpaid experience, education, contacts, roles held and key achievements. It is designed for work. Set up a profile by using the YouTube LinkedIn “InTip” team’s clips (very good! Check out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNl9RVrXLhM). Gather endorsements from those who know your work. Personal networks may provide 1st or 2nd degree links to organisations where work is being sought, allowing a trusted third party to broker on your behalf. Creating networks in themselves and becoming active in groups can enhance your reputation long before you are ready to seek that next job, and have you head-hunted for your dream job, not having to look.
  • Facebook (www.facebook.com): usually private social networking site, for family and friends, although many businesses also have facebook pages as part of their online PR strategies. However, you need to ensure that whatever is in the public domain is squeaky clean and positive, and stays that way. You may need to unfriend some people in order to clean up your facebook reputation.
  • MAYBE pick one of (if they suit your industry, but be judicious!):
    • Personal Blog/Website: where you have an ongoing online presence with opinion pieces, images and links. OK if you are able to present information in a way that an employer will make a positive interview decision after seeing it, and if the blog/site has been going for some time. Otherwise I suggest you take it down, or make it invitation only viewing (NB: but if you go invitation-only, ensure the pages are no longer indexed by search engines). Also be cautious in case (a) it looks as though you spend every waking minute writing online: the employer may be concerned that you have no time to do a paid job and (b) the tone is negative, opening the possibility in the employer’s mind for becoming grist for your mill.
    • Pintrest (www.pintrest.com): is an online pin-board of pictures, illustrating what rings the user’s bells. Some of us suit a more visual and creative approach to an online presence, and if you are able to present interests, ideas and philosophy in a way that an employer can absorb key information to make a positive interview decision, this can work well.
    • Glogster (www.glogster.com): is an online graphic blog, and can be used as a poster CV that you can put together. As with Pintrest, if you are able to present images in a way that an employer can absorb key information to make a positive interview decision, this can work well.
  • Google (www.google.co.nz): search your name online (NB: this is called a ‘vanity search’; cute!). You may have to work quite hard to chase down images which reflect poorly on you, but it is worth pursuing this.
  • Reppler (www.reppler.com): this is an online reputation management site, and is VERY useful. Log on using your facebook login, then connect to all other sites listed that you are a member of. Reppler will come back with a report on how positive or negative your online profile is. Follow the instructions to clean up dodgy profile areas (usually facebook!).

Hopefully that helps you start to navigate an online profile for yourself. It is worthwhile spending the time to get it right. Because remember, what goes online, stays online.



That Gender Divide



A month or two back, Richard Branson wrote a piece on "Why We Need More Women in the Boardroom", which was reposted on LinkedIn. Richard related how in the Virgin group of companies they are looking at how to actively remove barriers for women, and currently have two women CEOs and one 2IC; but he still feels his organisations have a long way to go. He closed with "take a look at who's sitting around your boardroom table. If you see 12 angry men [relating to the film of the same name], it's time to write a new script".

There was a bit of discussion on this topic. I shared some facts with the group.

Norway set up a quota system demanding 100% of all boards in the country must contain a minimum of 40% women by 2010. By 2010, Norway's boards contained 44% women. They have found that their boards are performing better, the companies are more sustainable financially, they have better 'organisational health' and women director numbers are still growing as people are now being selected on skill, not being limited by gender networks.

I think the Norway quota system is one of the main reasons why the gender diversity issue has returned to the public arena, because suddenly there is some data showing that the perceived 'reasons' why women aren't on boards (ie, skill lacks) are a house of cards.

In New Zealand, women form 51% of our population, are 46% of the entire workforce, but only receive 70% of a man's wage (based on 2010 statistics). STILL. New Zealand as a nation did so much for emancipation (in fact, Norway was the second in the world to us to give women the vote), but we are really behind the eight ball on women directors, running at 8.65%. Even Australia has 10% participation.

Some reading to help understand the inequity via some 'diversity' facts in our very middle-aged, middle class, church of England businessmen world; and Aotearoa is performing pretty much at the bottom:


In addition, we are rubbish at having board appointees from other ethnicities. The makeup of our organisations and our boards would be best to reflect our market's demographics. A key reason for reflecting our market's demographics - diversity - is that we then stay effortlessly in tune with our markets as tastes and societal mores change, because our organisations form a representative and synchronised 'mini market', moving along too in the course of living a life. Painless, consistent, evolutionary change.

When our organisations are truly representative of society, then we are not, as I feel the NZRU once was (and possibly still is) in danger of becoming a dinosaur through disconnect and lack of understanding: non-representative of our 'audiences', largely non-representative of our 'players'.



References:




Five Firefox Security Settings



If you are a Firefox user, there are five security settings that Mozilla emailed out last week. Go to Tools | Options | Security tab, and the security settings are:

  1. Unauthorised Add-ons: Firefox will warn you when a website tries to install an add-on and will block it. If Firefox does this and you trust the site, you can add an exception by clicking the 'Exceptions' button, entering the site name, and clicking the 'Allow' button, then 'Close'
  2. Block reported attack sites: Tick this box if you want Firefox to check all sites you visit for attacks, as you visit them.
  3. Block reported Web forgeries: Tick this box if you want Firefox to check all sites you visit for forgeries or phishing, as you visit them.
  4. Use a master password: Tick this box if you want Firefox to set a master password to protect your saved passwords and certificates by encrypting them. Firefox will ask you for a master password each time you need to access a certificate or stored password. Once you have ticked the box, the 'Change Master Password' button will activate so you can manage your password.
  5. Remember passwords for sites: Untick this box if you want Firefox to NOT automatically remember passwords for sites you visit. However, you will still be asked if you want Firefox to remember your password for a site on your first visit (NB: if you do this, you can't use a master password)




TLAs for SMEs



Here are this newsletter's TLAs (Three Letter Acronyms) for you:

  • RBA, risk-based authentication. A way to evaluate and decide levels of authentication stringency, based on the risk that system access might result in a security breach and how serious that breach might be. So authentication gets more comprehensive and restrictive if the system is more mission critical.


Please feel free to email me with any TLAs that you want to get the bottom (meaning!) of.



Tips, Short+Hot Keys

Over the next few newsletters, we are going to look at all you can do with panes. This time we look at PowerPoint:

  • PowerPoint "Move clockwise to the next pane or move between the navigation pane and topic pane" F6
  • PowerPoint "Move the window pane split in a maximized presentation window" Alt, Left Arrow, Down Arrow, P To Select The Splits, Arrow Keys To Position The Split, Then Enter OR Alt & - (minus), P To Select The Splits, Arrow Keys To Position The Split, Then Enter
  • PowerPoint "Move to the previous pane" Shift & F6
  • PowerPoint "Redisplay hidden pointer and/or change the pointer to an arrow or select the entire Help topic or (in slide sorter view) all slides or (in the outline pane) all text, or (in the slide pane) all objects" Ctrl & A



Hot Linx

Through some mitochondrial DNA examination of some early NZ Maori buried at Wairau, researchers are closer to knowing where Hawaiki is. Read on at http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/118896/hawaiki-now-closer-to-being-found and http://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/2012/10/23/dna-reveals-diversity-among-first-new-zealanders/

Read what veteran research-journo John Pilger has to say about the increasingly-suspicious case against Julian Assange at http://johnpilger.com/articles/the-pursuit-of-julian-assange-is-an-assault-on-freedom-and-a-mockery-of-journalism


For an uplift for clients on why they should chose roles to suit their passion, catch Alan Watts at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2L_cGjQSR80. It all comes down to doing what we love, in order to create those 10,000 hours of practice that leads to expertise



                                Catch you again soon!! E-mail your suggestions to me here
read more "Newsletter Issue 225, November 2012"