So I went briefly looking. There were so many items to choose from, depending on seasonality, country of origin and fabric used in manufacture. I wanted to see if there was a quick way to check the poster's claims.
The first thing I found is that the factorisation for cotton is 54kg of greenhouse gases per kilo (kg). So if everyone got a recycled long cotton shirt with a net weight of 220 grams, it would be 220,000kgs of shirt x 10.75kg CO2 and other greenhouse gases (GHG), which is 2,365,000kgs of GHG consumption in manufacture (Systain, 2009). That's a under half of the 6 million kg savings the poster promises.
Hmm... well, some items are a lot heavier - a pair of trousers might be nearly a kg. Hmm. But I didn't factor in the numbers for wool... or polar fleece.
OK, so moving to wool. That would be lower than cotton, as, while it is a natural fibre, it is grown outside with few herbicides, pesticides or fertiliser (here in New Zealand farmers mostly lime their paddocks, and not much else, to minimise costs). I found a study by Barber and Pellow (2006) detailing that the energy consumed for a merino top to land in China from NZ is 63MJ/kg whereas polyester is 125MJ/kg (download here). Right. So I still needed to know the carbon footprint of polar fleece/polyester in order to create a bit of a comparison.
Polar fleece works out as having the following relationship with carbon: 1kg polar fleece x 5.55kg carbon footprint (Wikipedia, n.d.). So half that of cotton ...which amazed me (despite this having been calculated by Tom Berners-Lee for Wikipedia, I'm unsure about this. So if anyone has better info, please comment. Oecotextiles - 2011 - seems to think that polyesters are a lot more GHG intensive than this). A polar fleece jumper weighs about twice that of a cotton shirt, so would work out at about the same value. Interesting.
Now I appreciate that this is guestimation as the measures aren't necessarily similar - it is not even estimation - but this gives us wool at 1/2 the GHG cost of polar fleece, which is again about a half of cotton. Some clothes are much heavier than a long shirt: jeans are about a kg, coats might even be two kgs. However, we wear many more tops, pieces of underwear, scarves, socks and tights than we do trousers. A summer dress is likely to be roughly the same weight as a long shirt.
Seeing as humans wear a lot of polar fleece, wool and light fabrics, the original post numbers above are possibly... probably inaccurate. I suspect a more accurate figure lies between my original fast and dirty calculation of the cotton shirts and the poster, especially when we factor in men's clothing.
However, the 1 Million Women message is STILL a great one, even if their maths are off. Not buying is still one of the easiest things we can do to cut consumption - regardless if we are women or men :-D.
The 7 Rs (read more here) start with "Refuse" to buy, and limiting purchasing is an inaction we can all take...
Sam
References:
- Barber, A., & Pellow, G. (2006). LCA: New Zealand merino wool total energy use. Paper presented at the 5th Australian Life Cycle Assessment Society (ALCAS) conference, Melbourne, 22-24 November, 22-24.
- Oecotextiles (2011). Estimating the carbon footprint of a fabric. Retrieved from https://oecotextiles.wordpress.com/2011/01/19/estimating-the-carbon-footprint-of-a-fabric/
- Systain (2009). Carbon Footprint Study 2009 Final Summary. Retrieved from https://www.systain.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Systain_Studie_Carbon_Footprint_English.pdf
- Wikipedia (n.d.). Polar Fleece. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_fleece
No comments :
Post a Comment
Thanks for your feedback. The elves will post it shortly.