The field of epistemology - research philosophy - is broad and technical. Epistemologies/philosophies can be divided into the following four categories: "intuitive knowledge" is what we believe or feel; authoritarianism relies on what 'experts' tell us in books, papers, etc; "logic" is the application of logical reasoning; and empiricism relies on objective, evidenced facts which can be demonstrated and replicated. It is this last section, that of empiricism, which fits with research methodology (Dudovskiy, 2022).
We can think of methodological epistemology as a taxonomy similar to that of plants and animals (i.e. Kingdom; Phylum/Division; Class; Order; Family; Genus; Species; Bali, 2022). Beginning at the animal 'kingdom' we have ontology: how we are, how we exist. Then we have epistemology (how we know we know things; or how we come to learning). After that we have our classes of epistemology, two meta categories of objectivity versus subjectivity. Then we have orders (see the examples below). The next layer down, like the family, is inquiry strategy (inductive, deductive, abductive or mixed). Then - like genus - we have our research design (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed). And lastly, we have our method or data collection instruments... such as interview/focus group; survey (Bali, 2022; Dudovskiy, 2022).
However, we have to know where we START in order to progress logically through the hierarchy. For example, if we start with a plant when we are actually classifying an animal, we will end up a long way from an appropriate choice. So we must know if we are undertaking objective or subjective research. In the social sciences, we are usually undertaking subjective research, which leads us to interpretivism, pragmatism and constructivism.
So, to come back to empiric epistemology, there are a number different orders, such as the six examples below:
Research philosophy |
Meta-category |
Epistemology: the researcher’s view regarding what
constitutes acceptable knowledge |
Positivism |
Objective |
"Only observable phenomena can provide credible data,
facts. Focus on causality and law-like generalisations, reducing phenomena to
simplest elements" (Dudovskiy, 2022). This is objective. |
Pragmatism |
Subjective |
"Either or both observable phenomena and subjective meanings
can provide acceptable knowledge dependent upon the research question. Focus
on practical applied research, integrating different perspectives to help
interpret the data" (Dudovskiy, 2022). |
Realism |
Objective, or subjective |
"Observable phenomena provide credible data, facts.
Insufficient data means inaccuracies in sensations (direct realism).
Alternatively, phenomena create sensations which are open to
misinterpretation (critical realism). Focus on explaining within a context or
contexts" (Dudovskiy, 2022). This is generally objective,
but can be subjective (e.g. critical realism). |
Interpretivism |
Subjective |
"Subjective meanings and social phenomena.
Focus upon the details of situation, a reality behind these details,
subjective meanings, motivating actions" (Dudovskiy, 2022). |
Constructivism |
Subjective |
"Knowledge is constructed, rather than innate, or
passively absorbed." "Learning is an active process",
"All knowledge is socially constructed", "personal" and
"exists in the mind" (McLeod, 2019). Subjective. |
Relativism |
Subjective |
"[T]here are no absolute grounds for truth or knowledge
claims. Thus, what is considered true will depend on individual judgments and
local conditions of culture, reflecting individual and collective experience.
[This] challenges the validity of science except as a catalog of experience
and a basis for ad hoc empirical prediction" (APA Dictionary of
Psychology, 2022). Subjective. |
I hope this is useful!
Sam
References:
APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2022). Relativism. American Psychological Association. https://dictionary.apa.org/relativism
Bali, A. (5 April 2022). Taxonomic Hierarchy of Plants and Animals: Biological classification. Collegedunia. https://collegedunia.com/exams/taxonomic-hierarchy-of-plants-and-animals-biological-classification-biology-articleid-1648
Dudovskiy, J. (2022). Epistemology. Business Research Methodology. https://research-methodology.net/research-philosophy/epistomology/
McLeod, S. (2019). Theories: Constructivism. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/constructivism.htm
Anything that helps to make you think first should be worth thinking about. Thks Sam
ReplyDeleteTrue! You make a good point that organising our mental filing cabinets for better retrieval should aid our recall too :-)
Delete