So I interpret Fanrner's research (2023) as a three dimensional model with one axis of ability; a second axis of benevolence, and a third of integrity. Just like the model in the image accompanying this post: we can think about trustworthiness as an intersectionality between these three characteristics.
If someone has the ability to trust (or be trustworthy), but has little integrity, then they won't be trustworthy. Also, if they have the ability to trust but aren't benevolent, then they won't be trustworthy either. If they have two of the three: say benevolence and abilities, but lack integrity, we are still not going to find them trustworthy: intentions and skills without follow-through won't cut it. We need all three to be trustworthy.
That is a pretty cool idea!
Sam
Reference:
Fahrner, M. (2023). Conditions and mechanisms of trust within boards of voluntary sport governing bodies. Sport Management Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2023.2247652
No comments :
Post a Comment
Thanks for your feedback. The elves will post it shortly.