Pages

Showing posts with label Redundancy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Redundancy. Show all posts

Wednesday, 23 July 2025

Keeping control with reduced hours

What happens when our hours get cut? What happens to all the jobs that we usually fill our time with? How does the same work get done in fewer hours? They are all very good questions to ask, and sometimes we need answers to these questions because our world of work has shifted, and we suddenly need to deliver the same work in fewer hours.

It never fails to amaze me in the government sector how people have a "point one" or "point four" time allocation for a particular element of their job. That portion might get slashed in a budget round, yet the work tasks remain - and usually remain linked to the worker's performance indicators. Further, it is extremely rare that job sizing is undertaken in times of shrinkflation: in fact, I would suggest that job sizing is as rare as unicorn excrement. 

The decision on what is important is often left to those of us who are doing the work. Most times, in my experience, with little to no guidance on how we are to determine what parts of our former job still needs to be done, what gets left, and what must be handed over to someone else.

A very pragmatic senior management friend of mine is one of the coolest, calmest, clearest-thinking customers you would ever meet. Their advice is to: 

  1. Firstly decide what jobs which we WANT to do; working out those things which will fit with our reduced hour budget. We aim to keep the jobs where we use our expertise, but to jettison those admin tasks such as reporting which don't require expertise, and those jobs which are 'nice to haves' as opposed to those which keep the money flowing in. And, realistically, software and AI should collectively be able to create reports. We shouldn't really need meat people for that (despite AI hallucination; Lingard, 2023).

  2. Then we make a list of those undesirable tasks and remainder of our role which we have no time for. We put the estimated hours against each of those tasks. For some of us this will be immensely easy, because we will keep a daily diary and roughly note down how many hours each task takes. A simple add up will help us to get a feel for how long each one takes. For those of us who have not had the training to keep a daily log, we will need to hurriedly create one. We can go back over the past week, then try to keep a daily note for however long we have before we need to get back to our manager with our budget proposal. And hopefully, if we have been in the "damn, why didn't I keep a note of that" camp, we will keep daily notes from now on, because it is very, very handy ammunition to have in our possession.

  3. Finally, we pass the undesirable list to our manager with the hour estimate, and advise them that -  as our reduced hours are insufficient for these to be completed - these tasks will need to be allocated to another. We should NOT ask what jobs we should stop doing: WE should decide what we want to leave behind, and simply pass on the remainder of our former role, which we are no longer going to be paid for, with the estimated hours each item takes. Once those tasks are passed on, they are no longer our problem. 

Of course this is ideal world stuff. But deciding ahead of the game what we want to keep and what needs to shift elsewhere leaves us at much less chance of being left with the bits of the job that anyone could do (and which is even less motivating). Being active in the process helps to give us back some sense of control.

Good luck: these processes take courage. Like many things worth doing, it is not easy, but it is liberating.


Sam

Reference:

Lingard, L. (2023). Writing with ChatGPT: An illustration of its capacity, limitations & implications for academic writers. Perspectives on Medical Education, 12(1), 261-270.  https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1072

read more "Keeping control with reduced hours"

Friday, 7 August 2009

Newsletter Issue 170, August 2009



Sam Young Newsletter


Issue 170, August 2009

Hi guys,

Be careful with redundancy - read on in The Double-Edged Sword of Redundancy below.

For those of you documenting processes and procedures, Capturing What's On Your Screen may give you a hand.


Don't forget, if you want to be taken off my mailing list, click here to send me a reply e-mail and I will remove your name.



The Double-Edged Sword of Redundancy



Recently, Michael Smyth, the Approachable Lawyer, wrote an interesting article in July about redundancy, asking "Is slash and burn the right strategy for your business?". View that newsletter at http://www.employedbutnotengaged.com/Articles/Article-List/1427/1517/. Michael kindly allows sharing of his work, which is great for all of us, so I have repeated his July article below for you all.

----

When the economic downturn first started to impact John’s business he was quick to act. First signs that turnover was dropping caused John to focus on his biggest overhead – the wage bill.

A swift round of redundancies gave immediate relief and he was able to sustain profit levels on an even keel. Six months later, however, turnover had dropped even further and he was facing a personal grievance claim from one of his employee’s with a possible payout of $1000s.

Where it had gone wrong

For several months following the redundancies, the business had been on an even keel and everyone was working harder to keep turnover at a respectable level. But after 3 months, John noticed that the performance of one of his key sales people was dropping off. Sales were there, it was just that he was losing out to the competition.
John’s immediate reaction was to embark upon a performance management process with Martin. At the initial meetings with Martin, John would hear complaints that Martin was overworked and didn’t have the support he needed to do his job. John considered these comments to be just an excuse and with more people in the job market as a result of the economic downturn, thoughts that there may be better qualified sales people out there looking for work crossed his mind.
Doggedly, John persevered with the performance management process. Sales didn’t improve (in fact they got worse) and verbal warnings were followed by written warnings until Martin was on the brink of dismissal.

That’s when the personal grievance was raised

The personal grievance alleged that Martin was suffering an unjustified disadvantage in the workplace. The specifics of the allegation were that the performance management process was unfair in that it:
  1. Failed to recognise that Martin needed more support in his role and therefore the targets which had been set were unreasonable;
  2. The time given to Martin to improve was also reasonable since he had a greater workload;
  3. Since the redundancies, Martin’s workload has significantly increased leading to workplace stress

Stress affects performance

It is now proven that stress affects performance both positively and negatively. In order to perform at optimum levels we require a degree of stress. Deadlines can be good because they force us to work efficiently and productively. However, too much stress has a negative effect on performance. Long hours at work, and working weekends without adequate rest impair performance and productivity. If this is allowed to continue for too long, physical symptoms manifest such as inability to sleep at night, poor concentration and moodiness.
Unfortunately, in times of recession these symptoms are all too common. An employer, will recognise the symptoms as poor performance rather than stress and therefore embark upon a performance management process. Of course, this increases the stress for the employee: the end of the employment relationship is inevitable unless the employer has a change of strategy. The only question is whether the employee raises a personal grievance or not.

The problem started with the redundancies

As part of the redundancy process, John made a number of his sales support staff redundant. This caused more work for the sales people, like Martin. Initially the sales people were able to cope, but after several months the cracks started to appear. Martin was the first to crack as he found it increasingly difficult to compete with the opposition. Consequently, turnover dropped and John started to panic. However, the problem wasn’t the recession: it was John’s initial slash and burn strategy. The redundancies had gone too far and placed too much pressure on those employees who remained in employment. John needed to re-think his strategy.

When to make redundancies

There is no question that redundancies are a good method of streamlining in order to survive an economic downturn. However, be careful how far you take your streamlining process. Consider the effect on the remaining employees because if you over-burden them too much, you could decrease productivity and decrease turnover even further. Worse still, you could end up being hit with a personal grievance. Redundancies are a good opportunity to trim the fat, but make sure that you don’t trim the meat.

By reducing the wage bill, you are still hoping to service the same number of clients. You aim to increase profits through reducing expenses.

But redundancy cannot come without a reduction in remaining staff workloads. As an employer you must make reasonable and fair decisions around what is a 'must have' and what is a 'nice to have'. You must prioritise the non-essentials; postponing, deferring or cancelling projects; axeing some work elements altogether; dumping some information requirements; streamlining or automating processes to lighten loads; or contracting out essential services that is no longer to be completed by employees. Many jobs can be rationalised via a restructure - ie, shuffle your existing roles around to focus them on what you really want to have completed - but you can rarely rationalise roles through redundancy.

Work rationalisation takes all the nous within your business to think through the "what ifs" with procedure changes. The people doing the job can think about all the tricky 1% of transactions, and find a process for them before you you go live and are dealing with real customers, with real money. Redundancy, on the other hand, means you strip away your nous and have your remaining staff band-aiding the tricky problems as they arrive in real time. Not only are those who remain having to deal with "Survivor Guilt", they are having to make continual seat-of-the-pants decisions, which is very stressful. When - during redundancy - that kind of decision-making becomes the norm, you will lose your employee goodwill very quickly.

To my knowledge, no one has ever saved themselves into millionaire-hood. Most people spend their way to wealth.

So think very carefully before you take the redundancy route. You may be better to explain your problem to your staff and ask them for their solutions. They are your experts in getting things done - and what can be done away with - after all.

To quote Michael's words "Wouldn't you love to stumble upon a secret library of legal advice for no cost? Head down to http://www.approachablelawyer.com today and judge for yourself". Check out his book, "Employed but Not Engaged" as well; a very reasonable buy at http://www.employedbutnotengaged.com/Buy/.



Capturing What's On Your Screen



If at any point you need to copy what you are seeing on screen for any reason (usually when you need IT help, or when you are documenting a procedure for staff training), most of you will know that there is a handy keyboard button - PrtScn - that will capture the image you are seeing on screen right this minute (aka 'screen dump'), and will paste it to the Windows Clipboard.

From there you can copy the image into whatever programme you desire; Ctrl & P will drop the screen dump into your open Word, Excel, Publisher, PowerPoint, image manipulation software ...or your email file.

However, some of you may not realise that there are another couple of refinements that you can add to this process.

  1. Firstly, you can hold the Alt key down while you tap the PrtScn key, and just capture the 'active' object - the box that you are in. So, for example, if you were in Word, and had the font box open, by Alt & PrtScn you could copy just the font box; not the entire background. This is a very useful facility to use when creating procedures.
    However, that still won't allow you to show the cursor, right click menu options, or layered windows. If you need that type of work, then you probably need some additional software....
  2. Secondly, you can download and install a piece of software such as Snagit (http://www.techsmith.com/screen-capture.asp) or Winsnap (http://www.ntwind.com/software/winsnap.html). These pieces of software allow you to do quite a lot more image manipulation, to amalgamate images and set things up for use in presentations, procedures and publications. Snagit - the more sophisticated of the two - will cost you USD$50, Winsnap USD$25 for a single licence. To view what Snagit's user tutorial online, go to http://video.techsmith.com/snagit/9/edu/showme/enu/new-user/new-user.asp



Move All Image Files To One Location



Here's a handy little tip to find - and move - all the photos on your system, using either the Windows' Search function, or "Everything" (download from http://www.voidtools.com/).

Start your search for your most common image types (eg "*.jpg, *.gif, *.tif") in your My Documents folders or your C: drive. The latter will copy all the icons you have on your system, all the desktop backgrounds, screen dumps and any other images your system uses.

When the search is complete, Ctrl & A to highlight all the files, click Ctrl & X to cut (or Ctrl & C to create a copy), then go to Windows Explorer and navigate to the folder you want to store the images in, and key Ctrl & V to paste them into the new location.

Very easy :-)



TLAs for SMEs



Here are this newsletter's TLAs (Three Letter Acronyms) for you:

  • DVR, Digital Video Recorder. A DVR is a kinda sorta Video Cassette Recorder, but with a hard drive for recording.
  • ZIP, Zoning Improvement Plan. The US ZIP code - aka Post Code - actually has a meaning! When it was introduced in 1963 in the US it "improved" on an earlier system of two-digit postal zones.


Please feel free to email me with any TLAs that you want to get the bottom (meaning!) of.



Tips, Short+Hot Keys

Over the next few newsletters, we are looking at all the things you can do with Alt, Shift, Ctrl in Windows Media Player. This is our third section in this series:

  • Windows Media Player "Show the Tools menu" Alt & T
  • Windows Media Player "Show the View menu" Alt & V
  • Windows Media Player "Go to the Features taskbar features" Alt & V, G
  • Windows Media Player "Move left or right or up or down on menus or lists" Arrow keys
  • Windows Media Player "Switch to full mode" Ctrl & 1
  • Windows Media Player "Switch to skin mode" Ctrl & 2
  • Windows Media Player "Select or clear check boxes for multiple items that are not contiguous" Ctrl & arrow keys, Spacebar



Hot Linx

For those of you in fresh & wonderful new relationships, you might want to know something about limerence. Check out the dictionary definition at http://www.reference.com/browse/Limerence and a Time Mag short at http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,952554,00.html


Take a couple of minutes out and take a look at this stop motion film by Takeuchi Taijin on YouTube - a variation on the Three Little Pigs fairy tale - at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmkLlVzUBn4 

Any women who are wanting to put themselves forward for Government roles, as well as registering with CCMAU and IOD, can also register at the Ministry of Women's Affairs, at http://www.mwa.govt.nz/women-on-boards/using-nom-serv



                                Catch you again soon!! E-mail your suggestions to me here
read more "Newsletter Issue 170, August 2009"