Showing posts with label validity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label validity. Show all posts
Monday, 26 January 2026
Friday, 9 May 2025
Making sense of testing
We use career assessments in order to help our clients in identifying their unique characteristics. Each assessment is designed to measure d...
Friday, 25 April 2025
Checking email addresses
As emails is still the most common way we communicate with our network, it is great having somewhere that an address can be checked before s...
Wednesday, 2 April 2025
Using career assessments from other countries
It is quite a process to create, test and normalise career assessment instruments (Stuart, 2004) , but living in the Antipodes, where we ha...
Monday, 24 February 2025
The Emperor has no clothes & AI
While I am sure that AI platforms will improve, I was struck by a Guardian long read article last year where a journalist reported that, ...
Friday, 25 October 2024
AI Hallucination
I have a burning question around the validity of AI. I have run my own tests ( here ) in ChatGPT, where I felt that the hype around AI was j...
Monday, 4 September 2023
The trustworthy qualitative data tangle
When evaluating our qualitative research data - our evidence - we need to consider what our standards for quality will be... but the terms ...
Monday, 18 April 2022
Evidence and MBTI
Last year I read Merv Emre's book on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (2018), which was a fascinating read. I had expected a clear-eyed e...
Friday, 2 April 2021
Methodolatry
I read a new term the other day: methodolatry (Bazeley, 2021). It was coined by Valerie Janesick (1994, 2000), a portmanteau word of methodo...
Sunday, 28 July 2013
Accurate Performance Predictors?
As a member of the HRINZ LinkedIn group, I was reading a member post the other day that was really fascinating. Posted by Anna Sage of Sag...